New Artistic Director For The Royal Ballet School

The Royal Ballet SchoolThe prestigious Royal Ballet School announced the appointment of Christopher Powney as their Artistic Director Designate last month, who is due to step into the role in April 2014. The current Artistic Director, Gailene Stock, is sadly unwell, and will retire from her post on 31 August 2014. As a result, the summer term of 2014 will see Powney taking over the running of the School after a transitional period. Jay Jolley will continue in the role of Acting Director and will lead the School’s artistic programmes into the 2013/14 academic year.

As one of the top classical dance training centres in the world, the Royal Ballet School has flourished under Stock and is hoped to continue this journey under Powney, selected unanimously to take the school further forward as the driving force behind exceptionally talented and motivated young dancers.

Powney, a former teacher at The Royal Ballet Upper School, is currently Artistic Director of the Dutch National Ballet Academy and has danced himself with Northern Ballet, English National Ballet and Ballet Rambert, as it was then known. During his career he has worked with some of the world’s leading artists, such as Rudolf Nureyev, Jiri Kylian, Lynn Seymour, Christopher Bruce, Twyla Tharp, Frederick Franklin, and Glen Tetley.

Powney later went on to focus on teaching, having qualified with The Royal Ballet School’s Professional Dancers Teachers’ Course. He was Assistant Artistic Director of the Central School of Ballet’s graduate touring company, and in 2000, he joined the teaching staff of The Royal Ballet Upper School. 2006 saw him invited to take on the position of graduate teacher with the dance department of the Royal Conservatoire in The Hague. Powney has also been a member of the board for the British Association of Performing Arts Medicine and was a jury member of the 2011 Prix de Lausanne competition.

Theatre Traditions

The Journal Tyne TheatreThe theatre is a world of mystique, intrigue and illusion, serving to delight and entertain its audience with spectacle, no matter how otherworldly. This tradition of theatre is still upheld in many venues and arts spaces across the country and even across the world, but equally much of the previous spectacle has developed to accommodate the twenty first century. Productions have alternative intents, aiming to shock and provoke audiences rather than provide a successful model of theatre which has been proven to work.

Despite many changes, developments and modernisations of the theatre, many of the time-old traditions remain stuck to the people, productions and venues. Superstition and performance ritual is just a small part of theatrical tradition, yet play a meaningful role in much of what is said and occurs without a second thought. Ever wondered why Shakespeare’s Macbeth is referred to as The Scottish Play, and not by its real name in the theatre? Why the Green Room is called just that? Why many dancers are wished good luck through “break a leg”, despite this being the worst thing that could happen to them?

A theatre or performance space is never without a Green Room, a place for the performers to rest, a limbo or sort of purgatory between the dressing rooms and the stage, somewhere to eat or sleep. There are many interpretations as to why this space – which may not even be green – is named as such, with one being that travelling actors would traditionally perform on the village or town green, and stay in the adjoining public house, usually called The Green Rooms.

Another name which has stuck is that of the theatre’s crew, responsible for set changes, scenery construction and other technical tasks which lift the production out of the rehearsal room. It is said that they are so called because traditionally they would be sailors, a ship’s crew, who would work in the theatre in between sea voyages. Despite many changes taking place to theatre over many years, these are just two features which have stuck.

Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.